Posts Tagged ‘NetApp’

Puppet Camp 2016 Recap

December 4, 2016

puppet-campLast week I had a chance to attend Puppet Camp 2016. Puppet Camp is a one day event that is held once a year in many places around the world including Australia. This time it was the fourth Melbourne conference, which gathered 240 attendees and several key partners, such as NetApp, Diaxion and Katana1.

In this blog post I want to give a quick overview of the keynote, customer and partner sessions, as well as my key takeaways from the conference.

First Impressions

I’ve never been to Puppet Camp before and this was my first experience. Sheer number of participants clearly shows that areas of configuration management and DevOps in general attracts a lot of attention of both customers and channel.

imag5067_2

You may have heard how Cisco in Q3 of 2015 announced Puppet support for the Nexus 3000 and 9000 series switches. This was not just an accident. I had a chance to speak to NetApp, who was one of the vendors presented at the conference, and they now have Puppet integration with their Data ONTAP / FAS platform, as well as E-Series and recently acquired SolidFire line of storage arrays. I’m sure many other hardware vendors will follow.

Keynote and Puppet Update

The conference had one track of sessions spread out throughout the day and was opened by a keynote from Robert Finn, APJ Sales Director at Puppet, who was talking about the raising complexity of modern IT environments and challenges that come with it. We have gone from tens of servers to hundreds of VMs and are now on the verge of the next evolution from hundreds of VMs to thousands of containers. We can no longer manage environments manually and that is where tools such as Puppet come into play and let us manage configuration and provisioning at scale.

Rob also mentioned the “State of DevOps Report” an annual survey Puppet has been running now for five years in a row. In 2016 they collected responses from 4600 technical professionals and shared a lot of their findings in a public report, which I’ll link in the references section below.

state_of_devops

Key takeaways: introducing configuration management in their software development practices organizations were able to achieve 3x lower change failure rate and 24x faster recovery from failures.

Ronny Sabapathee, Puppet Solutions Engineer gave an overview of the new features in the latest Puppet Enterprise 2016.4, such as corrective change reporting, changes to Puppet Orchestrator, enhancements in Code Manager and API improvements.

Key takeaways: Puppet ecosystem is growing quickly with Docker module, Jenkins plugin, significant enhancements in Azure module and VMware vRealize Automation/Orchestrator integration coming soon.

Customer Sessions

Rob Kenefik from SpecSavers spoke about their journey of scaling free version of Puppet from 10 to 290 nodes, what issues they came across and what adjustments they had to make, especially around the DB back-end.

Key takeaways: don’t use embedded Puppet database for production deployments. PostgreSQL (which is now default) provides required scalability.

Steve Curtis from ANZ briefly discussed how they automated deployment of Application Performance Monitoring (APM) agents using Puppet. Steve also has a post in Puppet blog, which I’ll link below.

Chris Harwood from Healthdirect Australia touched on a sensitive topic of organizational silos and how teams become too focused on their own performance forgetting about the customers, who should be the key priority for businesses offering customer-facing services.

Then he showed how Healthdirect moved some of the ops people to development teams giving devs access to infrastructure and making them autonomous, which significantly improved their development workflows and release frequency.

Key takeaways: DevOps key challenges are around people and processes, not technology. Teams not collaborating and lengthy infrastructure change management processes can significantly hinder development teams’ performance.

Partner Sessions

Dinesh Siriwardhane who represented Versent compared pros and cons of master/agent vs. masterless Puppet deployments and showed a demo on Puppet certificate management.

Key takeaways: Puppet master simplifies centralized management, provides reporting capabilities, but can be a single point of failure. Agentless deployment using GitHub has no single points of failure and is free, but can have major security repercussions if Git repository is compromised.

imag5085_1

Kieran Sweet and Pedram Sanayei from Sourced made a presentation on Puppet integration with Azure and how using Puppet instead of just the low-level Azure APIs and PowerShell, can significantly simplify deployment and configuration management in the Microsoft cloud.

Key takeaways: Azure Resource Manager is a big step forward from the old Azure Service Management (classic deployment model). In light of the significant recent enhancements in the Azure Puppet module, this can become a reasonable alternative to AWS.

Scott Coulton from Autopilot closed the conference with a session on Puppet integration with Docker and more specifically around container orchestration tools, such as Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, Mesos and Flocker. Be sure to check Scott’s blog and GitHub repository where you can find a Puppet module for Docker Swarm, Vagrant template and more.

Key takeaways: Docker can be used to deploy containers, but Puppet is still essential to keep configuration across the hosts consistent.

Conclusion

I spoke to a lot of customers at the conference and what became apparent to me was that Puppet is not just another DevOps tool amongst the many. It has a wide ecosystem of partners and has gone a long way since they started as a small start-up 12 years ago in 2005.

It has a strong use case for general configuration management in Linux environments, as well as providing application configuration consistency as part of CI/CD pipelines.

Speaking of the conference itself I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of sessions and organization in general. Puppet Camp will definitely stay on my radar. I’d love to come back next year and geek out with the DevOps crowd again.

References

Dell Compellent is not an ALUA Storage Array

May 16, 2016

dell_compellentDell Compellent is Dell’s flagship storage array which competes in the market with such rivals as EMC VNX and NetApp FAS. All these products have slightly different storage architectures. In this blog post I want to discuss what distinguishes Dell Compellent from the aforementioned arrays when it comes to multipathing and failover. This may help you make right decisions when designing and installing a solution based on Dell Compellent in your production environment.

Compellent Array Architecture

In one of my previous posts I showed how Compellent LUNs on vSphere ESXi hosts are claimed by VMW_SATP_DEFAULT_AA instead of VMW_SATP_ALUA SATP, which is the default for all ALUA arrays. This happens because Compellent is not actually an ALUA array and doesn’t have the tpgs_on option enabled. Let’s digress for a minute and talk about what the tpgs_on option actually is.

For a storage array to be claimed by VMW_SATP_ALUA it has to have the tpgs_on option enabled, as indicated by the corresponding SATP claim rule:

# esxcli storage nmp satp rule list

Name                 Transport  Claim Options Description
-------------------  ---------  ------------- -----------------------------------
VMW_SATP_ALUA                   tpgs_on       Any array with ALUA support

This is how Target Port Groups (TPG) are defined in section 5.8.2.1 Introduction to asymmetric logical unit access of SCSI Primary Commands – 3 (SPC-3) standard:

A target port group is defined as a set of target ports that are in the same target port asymmetric access state at all times. A target port group asymmetric access state is defined as the target port asymmetric access state common to the set of target ports in a target port group. The grouping of target ports is vendor specific.

This has to do with how ports on storage controllers are grouped. On an ALUA array even though a LUN can be accessed through either of the controllers, paths only to one of them (controller which owns the LUN) are Active Optimized (AO) and paths to the other controller (non-owner) are Active Non-Optimized (ANO).

Compellent does not present LUNs through the non-owning controller. You can easily see that if you go to the LUN properties. In this example we have four iSCSI ports connected (two per controller) on the Compellent side, but we can see only two paths, which are the paths from the owning controller.

compellent_psp

If Compellent presents each particular LUN only through one controller, then how does it implement failover? Compellent uses a concept of fault domains and control ports to handle LUN failover between controllers.

Compellent Fault Domains

This is Dell’s definition of a Fault Domain:

Fault domains group front-end ports that are connected to the same Fibre Channel fabric or Ethernet network. Ports that belong to the same fault domain can fail over to each other because they have the same connectivity.

So depending on how you decided to go about your iSCSI network configuration you can have one iSCSI subnet / one fault domain / one control port or two iSCSI subnets / two fault domains / two control ports. Either of the designs work fine, this is really is just a matter of preference.

You can think of a Control Port as a Virtual IP (VIP) for the particular iSCSI subnet. When you’re setting up iSCSI connectivity to a Compellent, you specify Control Ports IPs in Dynamic Discovery section of the iSCSI adapter properties. Which then redirects the traffic to the actual controller IPs.

If you go to the Storage Center GUI you will see that Compellent also creates one virtual port for every iSCSI physical port. This is what’s called a Virtual Port Mode and is recommended instead of a Physical Port Mode, which is the default setting during the array initialization.

Failover scenarios

Now that we now what fault domains are, let’s talk about the different failover scenarios. Failover can happen on either a port level when you have a transceiver / cable failure or a controller level, when the whole controller goes down or is rebooted. Let’s discuss all of these scenarios and their variations one by one.

1. One Port Failed / One Fault Domain

If you use one iSCSI subnet and hence one fault domain, when you have a port failure, Compellent will move the failed port to the other port on the same controller within the same fault domain.

port_failed

In this example, 5000D31000B48B0E and 5000D31000B48B0D are physical ports and 5000D31000B48B1D and 5000D31000B48B1C are the corresponding virtual ports on the first controller. Physical port 5000D31000B48B0E fails. Since both ports on the controller are in the same fault domain, controller moves virtual port 5000D31000B48B1D from its original physical port 5000D31000B48B0E to the physical port 5000D31000B48B0D, which still has connection to network. In the background Compellent uses iSCSI redirect command on the Control Port to move the traffic to the new virtual port location.

2. One Port Failed / Two Fault Domains

Two fault domains scenario is slightly different as now on each controller there’s only one port in each fault domain. If any of the ports were to fail, controller would not fail over the port. Port is failed over only within the same controller/domain. Since there’s no second port in the same fault domain, the virtual port stays down.

port_failed_2

A distinction needs to be made between the physical and virtual ports here. Because from the physical perspective you lose one physical link in both One Fault Domain and Two Fault Domains scenarios. The only difference is, since in the latter case the virtual port is not moved, you’ll see one path down when you go to LUN properties on an ESXi host.

3. Two Ports Failed

This is the scenario which you have to be careful with. Compellent does not initiate a controller failover when all front-end ports on a controller fail. The end result – all LUNs owned by this controller become unavailable.

two_ports_failed_2

luns_down

This is the price Compellent pays for not supporting ALUA. However, such scenario is very unlikely to happen in a properly designed solution. If you have two redundant network switches and controllers are cross-connected to both of them, if one switch fails you lose only one link per controller and all LUNs stay accessible through the remaining links/switch.

4. Controller Failed / Rebooted

If the whole controller fails the ports are failed over in a similar fashion. But now, instead of moving ports within the controller, ports are moved across controllers and LUNs come across with them. You can see how all virtual ports have been failed over from the second (failed) to the first (survived) controller:

controller_failed

Once the second controller gets back online, you will need to rebalance the ports or in other words move them back to the original controller. This doesn’t happen automatically. Compellent will either show you a pop up window or you can do that by going to System > Setup > Multi-Controller > Rebalance Local Ports.

Conclusion

Dell Compellent is not an ALUA storage array and falls into the category of Active/Passive arrays from the LUN access perspective. Under such architecture both controller can service I/O, but each particular LUN can be accessed only through one controller. This is different from the ALUA arrays, where LUN can be accessed from both controllers, but paths are active optimized on the owning controller and active non-optimized on the non-owning controller.

From the end user perspective it does not make much of a difference. As we’ve seen, Compellent can handle failover on both port and controller levels. The only exception is, Compellent doesn’t failover a controller if it loses all front-end connectivity, but this issue can be easily avoided by properly designing iSCSI network and making sure that both controllers are connected to two upstream switches in a redundant fashion.

First Look at UCS Performance Manager

May 12, 2016

Overview

perf_gaugeCisco UCS has been in the market for seven years now. It was quite expensive blade chassis when it was first introduced by Cisco in March 2009, but has reached the price parity with most of the server vendors these days.

Over the course of the last seven years Cisco has built a great set of products, which helps UCS customers in various areas:

  • UCS Central for configuration management across multiple Cisco UCS domains
  • UCS Director for infrastructure automation not only of UCS, but also network, storage and virtualization layers (don’t expect it to support any other vendors than Cisco for IP networks, though)
  • UCS Performance Manager for performance monitoring and capacity planning, which can also tap into your network, storage, virtualization and even individual virtual machines

UCS Performance Manager

UCS Performance Manager was first released in October 2014. The product comes in two versions – full and express. PM Express covers only servers, hypervisors and operating systems. The full version on top of that supports storage and network devices. Product is licensed on a per UCS server basis. So you don’t pay for additional network/storage devices or hypervisors.

PM supports vSphere hypervisor (plus Hyper-V), Cisco networking and EMC VNX / EMC VMAX / NetApp FAS storage arrays. By the list of the supported products you may quickly guess that the full version of Performance Manager is targeted mainly at NetApp FlexPod, VCE Vblock and EMC VSPEX customers.

Product architecture

UCS Performance Manager can be downloaded and quickly deployed as a virtual appliance. You might be shocked when you start it up first time, as the appliance by default comes configured with 8 vCPUs and 40GB of RAM. If you’re using it for demo purposes you can safely reduce it to something like 2-4 vCPUs and 8-12GB of RAM. You will experience some slowdowns during the startup, but performance will be acceptable overall.

UCS PM is built on Zenoss monitoring software and is essentially a customized version of Zenoss Service Dynamics with Cisco UCS ZenPacks. You may notice references to Zenoss throughout the management GUI.

ucspm_zenoss

Two main components of the solution are the Control Center and the Performance Manager itself. Control Center is a container orchestration product, which runs Performance Manager as an application in Docker containers (many containers).

ucspm_docker

When deploying Performance Manager you start with one VM and then you can scale to up to four VMs total. Each of the VMs can run in two modes – master or agent. When you deploy the first VM you will have to select it’s role at first login. You have to have one master host, which also runs an agent. And if you need to scale you can deploy three additional agent VMs and build a ZooKeeper cluster. One master host can support up to 500 UCS servers, when configured with 8 vCPUs and 64GB of RAM. Depending on your deployment size you may not ever need to scale to more than one Performance Manager VM.

Installation

After you’ve deployed the OVA you will need to log in to the VM’s CLI and change the password, configure the host as a master, set up a static IP, DNS, time zone, hostname and reboot.

Then you connect to Control Center and click “+ Application” button in the Applications section and deploy UCS PM on port 4979. For the hostname use Control Center’s hostname.

deploy_ucspm

Once the UCS PM application is deployed, click on the Start button next to UCS PM line in the Applications section

start_ucspm

Performance manager is accessible from a separate link which is Control Center’s hostname prefixed with “ucspm”. So if your CC hostname is ucspm01.domain.local, UCS PM link will be https://ucspm.ucspm01.domain.local:443. You can see it in Virtual Host Names column. You will have to add an alias in DNS which would point from ucspm.ucspm01.domain.local to ucspm01.domain.local, otherwise you won’t be able to connect to it.

When you finally open UCS PM you will see a wizard which will ask you to add the licences, set an admin account and add your UCS chassis, VMware vCenters and UCS Central if you happen to have one. In the full version you will have a chance to add storage and network devices as well.

ucspm_wizard

UCS performance monitoring

Probably the easiest way to start working with Performance Manager is to jump from the dashboard to the Topology view. Topology view shows your UCS domain topology and provides an easy way to look at various components from one screen.

ucspm_topology

Click on the fabric interconnect and you can quickly see the uplink utilization. Click on the chassis and you will get summarized FEX port statistics. How about drilling down to a particular port-channel or service profile or vNIC? UCS Performance Manager can give you the most comprehensive information about every UCS component with historical data up to 1 year based on the default storage configuration.

north_traffic

Another great feature you may want to straight away drill down into is Bandwidth Usage, which gives you an overview of bandwidth utilization across all UCS components, which you can look at from a server or network perspective. This can let you quickly identify such things as uneven workload distribution between the blades or maybe uneven traffic distribution between fabric interconnect A and B side or SAN/LAN uplinks going to the upstream switches.

ucspm_bandwidth

You can of course also generate various reports to determine your total capacity utilization or if you’re for example planning to add memory to your blades, you can quickly find out the number of DIMM slots available in the corresponding report.

memory_slots

VMware performance monitoring

UCS Performance Manager is not limited to monitoring only Cisco UCS blade chassis even in the Express version. You can add your hypervisors and also individual virtual machines. Once you add your vCenter to the list of the monitored devices you get a comprehensive list of VMware components, such as hosts, VMs, datastores, pNICs, vNICs and associated performance monitoring graphs, configuration information, events, etc.

Performance Manager can correlate VMware to UCS components and for example for a given VM provide you FC uplink utilization on the corresponding fabric interconnects of the chassis where this VM is running:

vmware_stats

If you want to go further, you can add individual VMs to Performance Manager, connected via WinRM/SSH or SNMP. Some cool additional functionality you get, which is not available in VMware section is the Dynamic View. Dynamic View lets you see VM connectivity from the ESXi host it’s running on all the way through to blade, chassis, vNIC, VIC, backplane port, I/O module and fabric interconnect. Which is very helpful for troubleshooting connectivity issues:

dynamic_view

Conclusion

UCS Performance Manager is not the only product for performance monitoring in virtualized environments. There are many others, VMware vRealize Operations Manager is one of the most popular of its kind. But if you’re a Cisco UCS customer you can definitely benefit from the rich functionality this product offers for monitoring UCS blade chassis. And if you are a lucky owner of NetApp FlexPod, VCE Vblock or EMC VSPEX, UCS Performance Manager for you is a must.

pm_dashboard

NetApp System Manager TLS Issue

February 29, 2016

lova_javaYesterday while working on one of the customers’ NetApp array I hit an issue which looked like an SSL misconfiguration at first.

I needed to run Network Configuration Checker to check for any inconsistencies between the active and persistent network configuration settings in the /etc/rc file. I used NetApp OnCommand System Manager 3.1.2 with Java 8. When I tried to run a network configuration check I got this error:

‘netapp.domain.local’ is not configured for secure management with TLS

net_checker

When browsing to controllers management I also got this:

‘netapp.domain.local’ is not configured for secure management with TLS. Sensitive information you supply including passwords will be visible to other computers on the network.

Do you want to continue with non-secure connection ?

The second issue you can ignore by just skipping the warning, but the Network Configuration Checker error you can’t.

Potential Resolution

I googled it up and NetApp KB article 2021507 “OnCommand System Manager Java Compatibility issues” came up, which suggested that all you need to do is enable TLS on the 7-Mode controller (on Cluster Mode it is enabled by default):

options tls.enable on

This did not work for me, though.

Alternative Solution

The reason why System Manager no longer works with SSL and requires TLS instead, is because Java 7u75 (and later) implemented a change that disabled SSLv3 due to the POODLE security vulnerability.

So you either have to enable TLS for Java 7u75 and later (which didn’t work in my case) or downgrade to Java 7u72, which is the previous release from 7u75.

Once that done you should no longer get the error neither in Network Configuration Checker, nor when logging in to controllers in System Manager.

Fix NetApp AutoSupport

November 20, 2015

I come across this issue too often. You need to fetch some information for the customer from the My AutoSupport web-site and can’t because the last AutoSupport message is from half a year ago.

Check AutoSupport State

When you list the AutoSupport history on the target system you see something similar to this:

# autosupport history show

autosupport

Mail Server Configuration

If AutoSupport is configured to use SMTP as in this case, then the first place to check is obviously the mail server. The most common cause of the issue is blocked relay.

There are two things you need to make sure are configured: NetApp controllers management IPs are whitelisted on the mail server and authentication is disabled.

To set this up on a Exchange server go to Exchange Management Console > Server Configuration > Hub Transport, select a Receive Connector (or create it if you don’t have one for whitelisting already), go to properties and add NetApp IPs on the network tab.

exchange.png

Then make sure to enable Externally Secured authentication type on the Authentication tab.

receiveconnector

Confirm AutoSupport is Working

To confirm that the issue is fixed send an AutoSupport message either from OnCommand System Manager or right from the console and make sure that status shows “sent-successfull”.

# options autosupport.doit Test

# autosupport history show

autosupport2

 

EMC Isilon Overview

February 20, 2014

isilon_logo_188x110OneFS Overview

EMC Isilon OneFS is a storage OS which was built from the ground up as a clustered system.

NetApp’s Clustered ONTAP for example has evolved from being an OS for HA-pair of storage controllers to a clustered system as a result of integration with Spinnaker intellectual property. It’s not necessarily bad, because cDOT shows better performance on SPECsfs2008 than Isilon, but these systems still have two core architectural differences:

1. Isilon doesn’t have RAIDs and complexities associated with them. You don’t choose RAID protection level. You don’t need to think about RAID groups and even load distribution between them. You don’t even have spare drives per se.

2. All data on Isilon system is kept on one volume, which is a one big distributed file system. cDOT use concept of infinite volumes, but bear in mind that each NetApp filer has it’s own file system beneath. If you have 24 NetApp nodes in a cluster, then you have 24 underlying file systems, even though they are viewed as a whole from the client standpoint.

This makes Isilon very easy to configure and operate. But its simplicity comes at a price of flexibility. Isilon web interface has few options to configure and not very feature rich.

Isilon Nodes and Networking

In a nutshell Isilon is a collection of a certain number of nodes connected via 20Gb/s DDR InfiniBand back-end network and either 1GB/s or 10GB/s front-end network for client connections. There are three types of Isilon nodes S-Series (SAS + SSD drives) for transactional random access I/O, X-Series (SATA + SSD drives) for high throughput applications and NL-series (SATA drives) for archival or not frequently used data.

If you choose to have two IB switches at the back-end, then you’ll have three subnets configured for internal network: int-a, int-b and failover. You can think of a failover network as a virtual network in front of int-a and int-b. So when the packet comes to failover network IP address, the actual IB interface that receives the packet is chosen dynamically. That helps to load-balance the traffic between two IB switches and makes this set up an active/active network.

131_22

On the front-end you can have as many subnets as you like. Subnets are split between pools of IP addresses. And you can add particular node interfaces to the pool. Each pool can have its own SmartConnect zone configured. SmartConnect is a way to load-balance connections between the nodes. Basically SmartConnect is a DNS server which runs on the Isilon side. You can have one SmartConnect service on a subnet level. And one SmartConnect zone (which is simply a domain) on each of the subnet pools. To set up SmartConnect you’ll need to assign an IP address to the SmartConnect service and set a SmartConnect zone name on a pool level. Then you create an “A” record on DNS for the SmartConnect service IP address and delegate SmartConnect DNS zone to this IP. That way each time you refer to the SmartConnect zone to get access to a file share you’ll be redirected to dynamically picked up node from the pool.

SmartPools

Each type of node is automatically assigned to what is called a “Node Pool”. Nodes are grouped to the same pool if they are of the same series, have the same amount of memory and disks of the same type and size. Node Pool level is one of the spots where you can configure protection level. We’ll talk about that later. Node Pools are grouped within Tiers. So you can group NL node pool with 1TB drives and NL node pool with 3TB drives into an archive tier if you wish. And then you have File Pool Policies which you can use to manage placement of files within the cluster. For example, you can redirect files with specific extension or file size or last access time to be saved on a specific node pool or tier. File pool policies also allow you to configure data protection and override the default node pool protection setting.

SmartPools is a concept that Isilon use to name Tier/Node Pool/File Pool Policy approach. File placement is not applied automatically, otherwise it would cause high I/O overhead. It’s implemented as a job on the cluster instead which runs at 22:00 every day by default.

Data Layout and Protection

Instead of using RAIDs, Isilon uses FEC (Forward Error Correction) and more specifically a Reed-Solomon algorithm to protect data on a cluster. It’s similar to RAID5 in how it generates a protection block (or blocks) for each stripe. But it happens on a software level, instead of hardware as in storage arrays. So when a file comes in to a node, Isilon splits the file in stripe units of 128KB each, generates one FEC protection unit and distributes all of them between the nodes using back-end network. This is what is called “+1” protection level, where Isilon can sustain one disk or one node failure. Then you have “+2”, “+3” and “+4”. In “+4” you have four FECs per stripe and can sustain four disk or node failures. Note however that there is a rule that the number of data stripe units in a stripe has to be greater than number of FEC units. So the minimum requirement for “+4” protection level is 9 nodes in a cluster.

dp2

The second option is to use mirroring. You can have from 2x to 8x mirrors of your data. And the third option is “+2:1” and “+3:1” protection levels. These protection levels let you balance between the data protection and amount of the FEC overhead. For example “+2:1” setting compared to “+2” can sustain two drive failures or one node failure, instead of two node failure protection that “+2” offers. And it makes sense, since simultaneous two node failure is unlikely to happen. There is also a difference in how the data is laid out. In “+2” for each stripe Isilon uses one disk on each node and in “+2:1” it uses two disks on each node. And first FEC in this case goes to first subset of disks and second goes to second.

One benefit of not having RAID is that you can set protection level with folder or even file granularity. Which is impossible with conventional RAIDs. And what’s quite handy, you can change protection levels without recreation of storage volumes, as you might have to do while transitioning between some of the RAID levels. When you change protection level for any of the targets, Isilon creates a low priority job which redistributes data within the cluster.

How to move aggregates between NetApp controllers

September 25, 2013

Stop Sign_91602

 

DISCLAMER: I ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE OR CORRUPTION OF DATA THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF CARRYING OUT STEPS DESCRIBED BELOW. YOU DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK.

 

We had an issue with high CPU usage on one of the NetApp controllers servicing a couple of NFS datastores to VMware ESX cluster. HA pair of FAS2050 had two shelves, both of them owned by the first controller. The obvious solution for us was to reassign disks from one of the shelves to the other controller to balance the load. But how do you do this non-disruptively? Here is the plan.

In our setup we had two controllers (filer1, filer2), two shelves (shelf1, shelf2) both assigned to filer1. And two aggregates, each on its own shelf (aggr0 on shelf0, aggr1 on shelf1). Say, we want to reassign disks from shelf2 to filer2.

First step is to migrate all of the VMs from the shelf2 to shelf1. Because operation is obviously disruptive to the hosts accessing data from the target shelf. Once all VMs are evacuated, offline all volumes and an aggregate, to prevent any data corruption (you can’t take aggregate offline from online state, so change it to restricted first).

If you prefer to reassign disks in two steps, as described in NetApp Professional Services Tech Note #021: Changing Disk Ownership, don’t forget to disable automatic ownership assignment on both controllers, otherwise disks will be assigned back to the same controller again, right after you unown them:

> options disk.auto_assign off

It’s not necessary if you change ownership in one step as shown below.

Next step is to actually reassign the disks. Since they are already part of an aggregate you will need to force the ownership change:

filer1> disk assign 1b.01.00 -o filer2 -f

filer1> disk assign 1b.01.01 -o filer2 -f

filer1> disk assign 1b.01.nn -o filer2 -f

If you do not force disk reassignment you will get an error:

Assign request failed for disk 1b.01.0. Reason:Disk is part of a failed or offline aggregate or volume. Changing its owner may prevent aggregate or volume from coming back online. Ownership may be changed only by using the appropriate force option.

When all disks are moved across to filer2, new aggregate will show up in the list of aggregates on filer2 and you’ll be able to bring it online. If you can’t see the aggregate, force filer to rescan the drives by running:

filer2> disk show

The old aggregate will still be seen in the list on filer1. You can safely remove it:

filer1> aggr destroy aggr1

Overview of NetApp Replication and HA features

August 9, 2013

NetApp has quite a bit of features related to replication and clustering:

  • HA pairs (including mirrored HA pairs)
  • Aggregate mirroring with SyncMirror
  • MetroCluster (Fabric and Stretched)
  • SnapMirror (Sync, Semi-Sync, Async)

It’s easy to get lost here. So lets try to understand what goes where.

Simple-Metrocluster

SnapMirror

SnapMirror is a volume level replication, which normally works over IP network (SnapMirror can work over FC but only with FC-VI cards and it is not widely used).

Asynchronous version of SnapMirror replicates data according to schedule. SnapMiror Sync uses NVLOGM shipping (described briefly in my previous post) to synchronously replicate data between two storage systems. SnapMirror Semi-Sync is in between and synchronizes writes on Consistency Point (CP) level.

SnapMirror provides protection from data corruption inside a volume. But with SnapMirror you don’t have automatic failover of any sort. You need to break SnapMirror relationship and present data to clients manually. Then resynchronize volumes when problem is fixed.

SyncMirror

SyncMirror mirror aggregates and work on a RAID level. You can configure mirroring between two shelves of the same system and prevent an outage in case of a shelf failure.

SyncMirror uses a concept of plexes to describe mirrored copies of data. You have two plexes: plex0 and plex1. Each plex consists of disks from a separate pool: pool0 or pool1. Disks are assigned to pools depending on cabling. Disks in each of the pools must be in separate shelves to ensure high availability. Once shelves are cabled, you enable SyncMiror and create a mirrored aggregate using the following syntax:

> aggr create aggr_name -m -d disk-list -d disk-list

HA Pair

HA Pair is basically two controllers which both have connection to their own and partner shelves. When one of the controllers fails, the other one takes over. It’s called Cluster Failover (CFO). Controller NVRAMs are mirrored over NVRAM interconnect link. So even the data which hasn’t been committed to disks isn’t lost.

MetroCluster

MetroCluster provides failover on a storage system level. It uses the same SyncMirror feature beneath it to mirror data between two storage systems (instead of two shelves of the same system as in pure SyncMirror implementation). Now even if a storage controller fails together with all of its storage, you are safe. The other system takes over and continues to service requests.

HA Pair can’t failover when disk shelf fails, because partner doesn’t have a copy to service requests from.

Mirrored HA Pair

You can think of a Mirrored HA Pair as HA Pair with SyncMirror between the systems. You can implement almost the same configuration on HA pair with SyncMirror inside (not between) the system. Because the odds of the whole storage system (controller + shelves) going down is highly unlike. But it can give you more peace of mind if it’s mirrored between two system.

It cannot failover like MetroCluster, when one of the storage systems goes down. The whole process is manual. The reasonable question here is why it cannot failover if it has a copy of all the data? Because MetroCluster is a separate functionality, which performs all the checks and carry out a cutover to a mirror. It’s called Cluster Failover on Disaster (CFOD). SyncMirror is only a mirroring facility and doesn’t even know that cluster exists.

Further Reading

NetApp VSC Single File Restore Explained

August 5, 2013

netapp_dpIn one of my previous posts I spoke about three basic types of NetApp Virtual Storage Console restores: datastore restore, VM restore and backup mount. The last and the least used feature, but very underrated, is the Single File Restore (SFR), which lets you restore single files from VM backups. You can do the same thing by mounting the backup, connecting vmdk to VM and restore files. But SFR is a more convenient way to do this.

Workflow

SFR is pretty much an out-of-the-box feature and is installed with VSC. When you create an SFR session, you specify an email address, where VSC sends an .sfr file and a link to Restore Agent. Restore Agent is a separate application which you install into VM, where you want restore files to (destination VM). You load the .sfr file into Restore Agent and from there you are able to mount source VM .vmdks and map them to OS.

VSC uses the same LUN cloning feature here. When you click “Mount” in Restore Agent – LUN is cloned, mapped to an ESX host and disk is connected to VM on the fly. You copy all the data you want, then click “Dismount” and LUN clone is destroyed.

Restore Types

There are two types of SFR restores: Self-Service and Limited Self-Service. The only difference between them is that when you create a Self-Service session, user can choose the backup. With Limited Self-Service, backup is chosen by admin during creation of SFR session. The latter one is used when destination VM doesn’t have connection to SMVI server, which means that Remote Agent cannot communicate with SMVI and control the mount process. Similarly, LUN clone is deleted only when you delete the SFR session and not when you dismount all .vmdks.

There is another restore type, mentioned in NetApp documentation, which is called Administartor Assisted restore. It’s hard to say what NetApp means by that. I think its workflow is same as for Self-Service, but administrator sends the .sfr link to himself and do all the job. And it brings a bit of confusion, because there is an “Admin Assisted” column on SFR setup tab. And what it actually does, I believe, is when Port Group is configured as Admin Assisted, it forces SFR to create a Limited Self-Service session every time you create an SFR job. You won’t have an option to choose Self-Assisted at all. So if you have port groups that don’t have connectivity to VSC, check the Admin Assisted option next to them.

Notes

Keep in mind that SFR doesn’t support VM’s with IDE drives. If you try to create SFR session for VMs which have IDE virtual hard drives connected, you will see all sorts of errors.